Skip to main content

Comparisons

Entra ID Application Proxy vs Pomerium

Microsoft Entra ID Application Proxy is a cloud-based reverse-proxy service that lets organizations publish on-premises web applications for secure remote access without a VPN. It pairs the Microsoft-hosted proxy service with a lightweight on-prem connector agent that uses outbound-only connections, so no inbound firewall ports need to be opened. Access is gated by Entra ID authentication and Conditional Access policies, and well suited for Microsoft-only environments (similar to Google IAP's compatibility with Google-only infrastructure).

Entra ID Application Proxy
Pomerium logo

Microsoft Entra ID Application Proxy is a cloud-based reverse-proxy service that publishes on-premises web applications for secure remote access without a traditional VPN. The platform pairs a Microsoft-hosted proxy service with a lightweight on-prem connector that uses outbound-only connections, so no inbound firewall ports need to be opened. By gating every session behind Entra ID authentication and Conditional Access policies, Application Proxy extends single sign-on and identity-based controls to legacy internal apps.

It's main features include:

  • Publishing on-premises web applications to remote users without deploying a VPN client.
  • Outbound-only connector agents that avoid opening inbound firewall ports, with connector groups for high availability and load balancing.
  • Native single sign-on and Conditional Access enforcement through Entra ID, included with P1 and P2 licenses.
Capability Pomerium Alternative
What is it? Self-hosted Reverse Proxy Cloud-based Reverse Proxy
Zero Trust Yes No
Continuous Verification Yes, every request is validated No
Device authentication Yes via Conditional Access / Intune
Open Source ✓Included ✕Not included
Client-based No No client for web apps; on-prem connector agent required
Fills the VPN gap Yes Publishes on-prem web apps without a VPN
Integrates with Multiple Identity Providers ✓Included Entra ID only
Protocols Supported HTTP/HTTPS, SSH, MCP, RDP, TCP, UDP, gRPC, databases HTTP/HTTPS and RDP
Latency Best. Deployed at edge, no latency or bandwidth costs. Traffic routed through Microsoft's cloud service
Layer 7 7 (HTTP/HTTPS Only)

Our Recommendation

If an organization is fully committed to Microsoft and mainly needs to publish on-prem Windows web apps to authenticated remote users, Entra ID Application Proxy is the path of least resistance — it's bundled with Entra ID P1/P2 and requires almost no new infrastructure.

Lead with Pomerium when the requirement is true zero-trust enforcement: continuous per-request authorization, fine-grained context-aware policy, multi-IdP and multi-cloud reach, and broader protocol support — without welding access control to a single identity vendor. Critically, this isn't either/or: Pomerium can use Entra ID as its identity provider, so it layers on top of an existing Microsoft investment rather than replacing it.

Use Cases

Best fit for Pomerium

  • One consistent access policy across multiple clouds and on-prem
  • Heterogeneous or multi-IdP environments
  • True zero-trust: continuous, per-request authorization
  • Protecting non-HTTP / TCP services alongside web apps
  • Self-hosted, air-gapped, or vendor-neutral requirements

Best fit for Entra App Proxy

  • Organizations already standardized on Entra ID P1/P2
  • Publishing legacy on-prem Windows web apps to remote users
  • Minimal new infrastructure; Microsoft-managed plumbing
  • Teams that want SSO + Conditional Access at the login boundary
  • No appetite to operate their own proxy layer

Strengths

Pomerium

  • Per-request authorization, not just authenticate-and-hand-off
  • IdP-agnostic — works with any OIDC/SAML provider
  • Context-aware policy down to route and method
  • Broad protocol and environment coverage
  • Self-hostable; no dependency on one vendor's cloud
  • Reviewers rate it easier to set up and administer

Entra ID App Proxy

  • Near-zero infrastructure — Microsoft runs the service
  • Outbound-only connector; no inbound firewall ports
  • Bundled with existing Entra ID P1/P2 licensing
  • Tight, native integration with the Microsoft stack
  • Built-in HA and load balancing via connector groups

Weaknesses

Pomerium

  • You operate it — more control means more responsibility
  • Not bundled into an existing Microsoft license
  • Requires deliberate deployment/topology decisions

Entra ID App Proxy

  • Authorization is coarse — login-time, not per request
  • Locked to Entra ID; no multi-IdP support
  • Primarily HTTP/HTTPS web apps
  • Deep coupling to the Microsoft ecosystem and licensing
  • Limited reach across non-Microsoft clouds

Evaluators Should Know

  • They aren't mutually exclusive. Pomerium can use Entra ID as its identity provider, so it complements an existing Microsoft investment rather than ripping it out.
  • "VPN-less access" means different things here. App Proxy gets the right authenticated user to a published web app; Pomerium continuously authorizes every request against contextual policy.
  • Licensing shapes the decision. App Proxy rides along with Entra ID P1/P2, which can make it look "free" — but that value is tied to staying in the Microsoft ecosystem.
  • Scope of protection differs. If the estate includes non-HTTP services, multiple clouds, or multiple identity providers, App Proxy's boundaries show quickly.
  • Operational model is a real trade-off. Microsoft-managed simplicity vs. self-hosted control is the central tension — weigh it against the org's security posture and compliance needs.

Get a Personalized Demo

Schedule a Call with a Pomerium Engineer

Get a Demo